![]()
Name_____________________________________________________
|
|
2 |
4 |
6 |
8 |
|
Group Work |
Group did not work well together, members did little to share & discuss, too much individual work was done, group “goofed off” instead of working |
Group worked well at times, some team work and discussion of ideas was noted, too much individual work done |
Group worked as a team sharing ideas & roles a majority of the time, group seems to have cohesion & cooperation for common goal |
Group had cohesion & cooperation throughout project. Goal was met with utmost unity of group |
|
Individual Work (chart and role) |
Individual did little to complete their role and did little to complete their individualized portion |
Individual performed role sometimes but with lack of effort and enthusiasm, did little to complete individualized portion |
Individual performed role most of the time with effort & enthusiasm, individual portion was complete |
Individual went above & beyond what was expected, Effort & enthusiasm were evident at all times |
|
Organization of Data and Research |
Little or no research was done, evidence was not provided, little or no documentation |
Some research was done to reach goal but was not kept organized & little documentation evident |
Adequate research was done, data is organized & ready to assemble, sources are documented |
Research is exceptional & well organized, documentation is well done |
|
Flyer: Format and Organization |
Flyer had little or no thought, no plan is evident, not visibly appealing, little effort |
Flyer had evidence of some planning, somewhat neat & appealing, some effort took place |
Flyer was planned, visually appealing to most, organized & neat, adequate effort |
Flyer looks professionally done, could be used in actual marketing for product, effort is above & beyond expected |
|
Flyer: Info, Grammar and Spelling (X2) |
Not all info is present, difficult to understand what product is and basics of product, many errors noted |
Not all info is present, relatively easy to get gist of product, some errors noted |
Info present, easy to understand what product is and how it works and how it relates to enzyme topic, few if any errors |
Info present, easy to understand elements of product, very good explanations, few if any errors |
|
Press Release: Grammar, Spelling and Length |
More than 3-4 errors, not well done, not proper length |
3 or fewer errors, minor “slips”, proper length |
1-2 errors, nothing glaring, well done, proper length |
No “evident” errors, very well written, proper length |
|
Press Release: Background, Product info, Believability, Audience (X2) |
Little or no background given, difficult to tell what product does, not believable, who is audience? |
Some background is given, product info is available and mostly believable, would be difficult for audience |
Good job on background, good use of research & group collaboration, product info seems reliable and believable, average person would understand enzymes, how they work and how product works |
Great!! See 3+ |
|
Overall |
Little or no effort was done, not much was accomplished, learning is not evident, group did not meet expectations |
Some effort took place, learning was at minimum, group did not fully meet expectations |
Effort was given, group tried, learning is evident, expectations met |
Could work professionally, group gave 110%, above and beyond expectations of the project! |
TOTAL POINTS : OUT OF __________________________80 POINTS